How Do I Ensure My AI Underwriting Models Comply with Consumer Duty?
Quick Answer
The Consumer Duty has fundamentally rewired the relationship between AI and insurance. Learn how to ensure your underwriting models comply.
Detailed Answer
This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial or legal advice. You should consult with a qualified professional before making any decisions about the use of AI in your firm.
How Do I Ensure My AI Underwriting Models Comply with Consumer Duty?
The Consumer Duty has fundamentally rewired the relationship between AI and insurance. Your AI underwriting model is no longer a back-office efficiency tool; it is a frontline compliance risk. If your model produces an outcome that the FCA deems unfair, it is not the algorithm that will be held accountable. It is you.
The Duty demands that you deliver good outcomes for retail customers. This is not a vague aspiration; it is a hard-edged regulatory requirement. When you use AI to decide who gets cover and at what price, you are automating your compliance with this duty. The FCA has been explicit: they will use the Consumer Duty to intervene where AI leads to consumer harm.
The "Ethnicity Penalty" and the "Poverty Premium": AI's Foreseeable Harms
The most significant risk of AI in underwriting is its potential to create or amplify bias, leading to discriminatory outcomes. This is not a theoretical problem. The FCA has already found evidence of it.
- The "Ethnicity Penalty": The regulator has seen firms using third-party data that contains proxies for race, leading to customers from minority ethnic backgrounds paying more for the same cover.
- The "Poverty Premium": AI-driven hyper-personalisation can lead to disadvantaged customers being charged more or being deemed "uninsurable," effectively locking them out of the market.
These are not unfortunate side effects; they are foreseeable harms. Under the Consumer Duty, you have a duty to avoid them. If your AI model is producing these outcomes, you are in breach.
Stress-Testing Your AI Against the Four Consumer Duty Outcomes
To ensure compliance, you must be able to demonstrate how your AI underwriting model delivers on the four core outcomes of the Consumer Duty:
| Consumer Duty Outcome | How Your AI Underwriting Model Can Fail |
|---|---|
| 1. Products & Services | Your model could define a target market so narrowly that it systematically excludes certain groups of customers, even if they would be suitable for the product. |
| 2. Price & Value | Your algorithmic pricing could create a "loyalty penalty" or charge different prices for the same risk, leading to a failure to provide fair value. |
| 3. Consumer Understanding | If you cannot explain in simple terms why your AI has declined an application or charged a certain premium, you are failing the consumer understanding outcome. |
| 4. Consumer Support | If a customer queries a decision made by your AI, and your staff are unable to provide a clear and coherent explanation, you are not providing adequate support. |
A Practical Framework for Compliant AI Underwriting
Ensuring your AI models comply with the Consumer Duty requires a deliberate and robust governance framework. "We trust the data scientists" is not a defence.
- Conduct Pre-Deployment Bias Audits: Before you let any new model loose on your customers, you must conduct rigorous bias and fairness testing. This involves testing the model's outputs against different demographic groups to identify any discriminatory patterns.
- Scrutinise Your Data: Your model is a reflection of the data it is trained on. You must have a deep understanding of your data sources, both internal and third-party, and you must have a process for identifying and mitigating any inherent biases.
- Implement Meaningful Human Oversight: You need a "human in the loop" who can review, challenge, and override the AI's decisions, particularly for complex cases, vulnerable customers, or declined applications. This cannot be a rubber-stamping exercise.
- Prioritise Explainability: You must be able to explain the key factors that drive your model's decisions. If you are using a "black box" model, you need to be able to explain the safeguards and controls you have put in place to prevent unfair outcomes.
- Monitor Continuously: Compliance is not a one-time event. You need to continuously monitor your model's performance in the live environment to detect any "model drift" or emerging biases.
The Bottom Line: The FCA is Watching
The FCA has made it clear that it is concerned about the potential for AI to cause consumer harm in the insurance sector. It has the tools, the data, and the political will to act.
The Consumer Duty is your AI reality check. It forces you to move beyond the technical complexities of model building and to focus on the real-world impact on your customers.
If you cannot demonstrate that your AI underwriting models are fair, transparent, and delivering good outcomes, then you are not just taking a compliance risk; you are taking a business-ending one.
Take the Next Step
If you are ready to move from theory to action, I can help. My AI Audit gives you a comprehensive assessment of your firm's AI readiness, identifying the gaps in your governance, the risks in your current tooling, and a clear roadmap to get you where you need to be.
Book a Discovery Call → or learn more about the AI Audit.