This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial or legal advice. You should consult with a qualified professional before making any decisions about the use of AI in your firm.

---

How Do I Ensure Consumer Duty Compliance When Using AI for Customer Decisions?

The Consumer Duty is the FCA’s line in the sand. It demands that you deliver good outcomes for retail customers. When you use AI to make decisions about those customers – from pricing insurance to approving loans – you are not just automating a process; you are automating your compliance with the Duty. And if your AI gets it wrong, you are on the hook.

For years, the financial services industry has been grappling with the promise and peril of AI. The Consumer Duty has turned that theoretical debate into a practical reality. The FCA has been explicitly clear: the Duty applies to AI just as it applies to any other part of your business. In fact, the use of AI amplifies the risks and raises the stakes.

The Four Outcomes: An AI Stress Test

The Consumer Duty is built around four key outcomes. When you use AI, you need to stress-test your systems against each one:

Consumer Duty Outcome	How AI Can Put You in Breach
1. Products & Services	Your AI-driven product design could create a product that is perfect for a specific segment but entirely unsuitable for another, leading to foreseeable harm.
2. Price & Value	Algorithmic pricing can lead to "hyper-personalisation," where some customers get great deals, and others are priced out of the market or charged unfairly. This is the "poverty premium" in action.
3. Consumer Understanding	If you cannot explain how your AI made a decision, how can you ensure your communications to the customer are clear, fair, and not misleading? The "black box" problem is a direct challenge to this outcome.
4. Consumer Support	If your AI-powered chatbot is providing inaccurate information or is unable to handle a vulnerable customer's query, you are not providing adequate support.

"Good Faith" and the Biased Algorithm

One of the cross-cutting rules of the Duty is that you must act in "good faith." This is where the issue of algorithmic bias becomes critical.

Your AI model is only as good as the data it is trained on. If that data reflects historical biases – and it almost certainly does – your AI will learn and amplify those biases. It might learn that certain postcodes are higher risk, or that people with certain job titles are less creditworthy. This can lead to discriminatory outcomes that are a clear breach of the good faith requirement.

The FCA has stated that "firms using AI technologies in a way that embeds or amplifies bias, leading to worse outcomes for some groups of consumers, might not be acting in good faith."

Foreseeable Harm: The Known Unknowns of AI

Another cross-cutting rule is that you must "avoid foreseeable harm." With AI, the "foreseeable harms" are well-documented:

• Financial Exclusion: As the FCA and PRA have warned, AI-based screening could lead to certain groups being deemed "uninsurable" or "un-lendable."
• Inaccurate Decisions: AI models can and do make mistakes. If you are relying on them without robust validation and human oversight, you are causing foreseeable harm.
• Lack of Explainability: If a customer challenges a decision made by your AI, and you cannot explain it, you are causing foreseeable harm.

A Practical Framework for AI and the Consumer Duty

So, how do you navigate this minefield? You need a deliberate, structured approach to AI governance that is explicitly mapped to the Consumer Duty.

1. Map Your AI to the Duty: For every AI system you use that impacts retail customers, you need to document how it meets each of the four outcomes and the three cross-cutting rules.
2. Conduct Algorithmic Impact Assessments: Before you deploy any new AI system, you need to conduct a thorough impact assessment that specifically looks at the potential for bias, discrimination, and other forms of customer harm.
3. Implement Robust Testing and Validation: You need to have a continuous process for testing and validating your AI models to ensure they are performing as expected and not producing biased or inaccurate results.
4. Ensure Meaningful Human Oversight: This is not a tick-box exercise. You need to have qualified individuals who can understand, challenge, and, if necessary, override the decisions made by your AI.
5. Prioritise Transparency and Explainability: You need to be able to explain to your customers, and to the FCA, how your AI systems work. If you are using a "black box" model, you need to be able to explain the safeguards you have put in place to protect against negative outcomes.

The Bottom Line: The Consumer Duty is Your AI Reality Check

The Consumer Duty has stripped away the hype and forced a conversation about the real-world impact of AI on customers.

It is no longer enough to say that your AI is "innovative" or "efficient." You have to be able to prove that it is fair, that it is transparent, and that it delivers good outcomes for your customers.

If you cannot, then you have a choice to make: either fix your AI or switch it off. Because under the Consumer Duty, there is no middle ground.

---

Take the Next Step

If you are ready to move from theory to action, I can help. My AI Audit gives you a comprehensive assessment of your firm's AI readiness, identifying the gaps in your governance, the risks in your current tooling, and a clear roadmap to get you where you need to be.

Book a Discovery Call → or learn more about the AI Audit.