This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified professional before making any decisions about the use of AI in your law firm.

---

How Do I Create an AI Acceptable Use Policy for My Law Firm?

An AI Acceptable Use Policy (AUP) is not a 'nice-to-have' document; it is an essential shield against regulatory action, client disputes, and reputational damage. Without one, you are telling your lawyers that the Wild West of AI is open for business within your firm, and you are accepting all the risk that comes with it.

Your lawyers are already using AI. Whether it is the free version of ChatGPT, a transcription tool, or a legal research platform with AI features, the technology is in your firm. The question is not if they are using it, but how. An AUP is your first line of defence in controlling that usage.

Why Your Standard IT Policy Is Not Enough

Your existing IT policy, written in the pre-GenAI era, is woefully inadequate for the challenges of artificial intelligence. It does not account for the unique risks of AI, such as:

• Data Poisoning: Malicious actors corrupting the data an AI is trained on.
• Model Hallucination: The AI generating plausible but entirely fabricated information.
• Algorithmic Bias: The AI producing discriminatory outputs based on biased training data.
• Confidentiality Breaches: Staff inputting sensitive client data into public AI models.

An AUP is a specific, targeted document that addresses these risks head-on.

Core Components of a Law Firm AI Acceptable Use Policy

A robust AUP should be clear, concise, and practical. It should not be a dense, legalistic document that no one reads. Here are the essential components:

Section	Key Considerations
1. Introduction & Scope	Clearly state the purpose of the policy and which AI tools it covers. Distinguish between firm-sanctioned tools (e.g., your private ChatGPT Enterprise instance) and prohibited tools (e.g., public, free AI models).
2. Prohibited Uses	This is your red line. Explicitly forbid the input of any client-identifiable or confidential firm information into public AI models. This is non-negotiable.
3. Permitted Uses & Due Diligence	For firm-sanctioned tools, define what they can be used for (e.g., summarising research, drafting internal communications). Crucially, you must mandate human oversight. All AI-generated content must be verified for accuracy, bias, and appropriateness by a qualified lawyer before use.
4. Data Handling & Confidentiality	Reiterate the firm's data classification policy. Explain how to handle different types of data when using AI tools. For example, anonymising data before inputting it into a sanctioned tool.
5. Accountability & Responsibility	Make it clear who is responsible. The fee-earner using the tool is responsible for its output. The COLP is responsible for the overall governance framework. The firm is responsible for providing the training and tools to enable compliance.
6. Transparency with Clients	Your policy must address when and how to inform clients about the use of AI in their matters. This is a key requirement of the SRA and the Consumer Duty.
7. Reporting & Monitoring	Establish a clear process for reporting concerns about AI usage or outputs. Explain that the firm will monitor the use of sanctioned AI tools to ensure compliance with the policy.
8. Consequences of Non-Compliance	State clearly that violating the AUP will be treated as a serious disciplinary matter.

The Rohit's Tone: Straight, No Chaser

When I work with firms to build these policies, I cut through the jargon. Here is how I would phrase some of the key points in a way that lawyers will actually understand and remember:

• On Public AI: "If you wouldn't discuss it in a pub, don't type it into a public AI. Assume anything you put into a free tool is immediately public knowledge. No exceptions."
• On Verification: "AI is a powerful but lazy intern. It will make things up. You are the partner on this matter. Every word it generates is your responsibility. Verify everything. Trust nothing."
• On Accountability: "If you use an AI tool and it goes wrong, the excuse 'the AI did it' will not work. You did it. You are the lawyer. You are accountable."

The Bottom Line: An AUP is a Leadership Test

Creating an AI Acceptable Use Policy is not a task to be delegated to the IT department. It is a fundamental test of your firm's leadership and its commitment to risk management.

It requires you to understand the technology, to think critically about the risks, and to communicate clearly with your people. It is the foundation of responsible AI adoption.

If you do not have an AUP, you do not have an AI strategy. You have a liability.

---

Take the Next Step

If you are ready to move from theory to action, I can help. My AI Audit gives you a comprehensive assessment of your firm's AI readiness, identifying the gaps in your governance, the risks in your current tooling, and a clear roadmap to get you where you need to be.

Book a Discovery Call → or learn more about the AI Audit.